Again this is something which I think is common to all nested loops in KNIME, e.g.:
Has at Node11:
And at Node12:
I agree that the duplicate names, presumably with different values during subsequent executions, is confusing but I think that is again pretty much hard-wired into the KNIME framework.
I’m wondering though - is there a reason why you are nesting two benchmarking loops, one with and one without the memory monitoring?
Thanks for the head up. reason why I was using two benchmark nodes was just for testing purpose. I stumbled across the duplicated variables the first time and thought it’s related to the benchmark nodes. Thanks again for the clarification.