Continuing the discussion from Call the workflow table based on the variable that does not accept with the path:
Is it possible to save the workflow execution executed in the Workflow Executor node?
Thx
Continuing the discussion from Call the workflow table based on the variable that does not accept with the path:
Is it possible to save the workflow execution executed in the Workflow Executor node?
Thx
@cridiaz what you could do is omit the “-nosave” option and then zip the workflow with a timestamp. You just might have to make sure that it will be reset at the start of the next round.
Ok thanks @mlauber71 but let me explain better I batch launch a wkf with the -nosave option omitted, this wfk does some processing and then inside it through the Workflow Reader and Workflow Executor nodes I launch a second wkf called LK_ I wanted to know if it was possible to save also the execution of LK_ because at the moment I don’t see it, maybe I have to put the Save Workflow node?
@cridiaz I think you could try and employ the concepts of integrated deployment and maybe save your workflow under a name with a timestamp. What you might want to notice is that sometimes it seems that within batch local path variables might not work as expected and you might want to provide a path via a workflow or a static variable.
Blog: An Introduction to Integrated Deployment
KNIME Collections: Getting started with Continuous Deployment for Data Science (CDDS) for Business Hub
KNIME Integrated Deployment Guide
https://docs.knime.com/latest/integrated_deployment_guide/index.html